NCWD/Youth logo
4 photos of people with disabilities in the workplace on a blue background.
School-based Preparatory Experiences Main Page

On this Page
   - Introduction
   - Questions
   - Resources

Audience Answers

   - Administrators
   - Employers
   - Youth Service Practicioners
   - Policymakers
   - Youth / Families

Printer Versions

   - This page only
   - The Entire Document

Preparatory Experiences — Policymaker Section

Introduction

School-based preparatory experiences are designed to help youth ready themselves for success in postsecondary education and/or a career. They include the core activities of career assessments (formal and informal), opportunity awareness (guest speakers, informational interviews, research-based activities, community mapping, exposures to postsecondary education), and work readiness skills (soft-skills development, computer competency, and job search skills). However, our education system does not provide youth with enough of these school-based preparatory experiences to make informed choices about careers. This weakness was recognized and addressed through the School-to-Work Opportunities Act (STWOA) of 1994. An explicit assumption of STWOA, a systems change initiative, was that schools and organizations connected to schools needed a new way of doing business. Helping young people make informed choices became as essential as the basics of education - being able to read, write, and compute.

The cost of not making informed choices is difficult to calculate but is evident in its effect on individuals, families, and society. Youth who do not understand the relevancy to the "real world" of what is being taught in their classes are likely to become poor performers or drop-outs. Students who lack an understanding of the skills and knowledge required for pursuing their desired occupations may make poor course selections, and can often spend a decade or more wandering around in the secondary labor market before establishing a career trajectory. These outcomes, along with other similar scenarios, are indicators of insufficient attention given to helping young people inform themselves about career options.

The cost of providing these essential services is not prohibitive; however, no one organization has the capacity to provide the full range of services to expose youth to, and ensure their participation in, career opportunities. Collaboration among organizations such as schools (including career and technical education programs, special education, and transition services), postsecondary institutions, youth-serving organizations, vocational rehabilitation organizations, One-Stops, and employers, can ensure comprehensive services and supports for all youth, and youth with disabilities in particular.

Education and Employment Outcomes for People with Disabilities

 
  • One third of students with disabilities do not finish high school;

  • Only one third of young people with disabilities who need job training receive it;

  • Only a quarter of young people who need life skills training, tutoring, interpreting or personal counseling receive these services;

  • More than half of all young people with emotional disabilities are arrested at least once within three to five years of exiting school;

  • People with disabilities enroll in postsecondary education at half the rate of the general population;

  • Only 26 percent of working age adults with disabilities have a job or own their own business.

Youth with disabilities have the same need as all other youth to be exposed to career options and school-based preparatory experiences. However, these youth too often encounter low expectations and lack of opportunities that interfere with their ability to learn about career options and their preparation for careers. Many leave school without having had opportunities to learn about different careers or to build the strong academic skills and workplace competencies needed to succeed in many careers. Coupled with lack of opportunities that build their knowledge, skills and abilities, and that foster confidence, many youth with disabilities do not go on to further education and training. As the statistics above reveal, youth with disabilities, particularly those with significant disabilities, experience poor education and employment outcomes.

Core Activities and Services that Help YWD Make Informed Choices about Career Opportunities and Pathways

 
  • Career assessments (formal and informal);

  • Exposure to a variety of career opportunities via guest speakers and informational interviews;

  • Research-based activities that engage youth through the use of the internet and mapping of community opportunities;

  • Exposure to postsecondary education institutions through visits and guest speakers, and

  • Development of work readiness skills (soft and hard skills, computer competency, and job search skills).

The above core activities and services can be provided by youth-serving organizations as part of the school day, as part of a transition curriculum, or through after-school programs. They should lead to the next level of preparation -- time spent in a variety of workplaces through site visits, job shadowing, and actual work experience (paid or unpaid).

As a policymaker, you have the ability to set the process in motion. By ensuring that organizations focus on helping prepare youth to make informed choices about career pathways, and by fostering policies that encourage collaboration among multiple organizations, you ensure that these organizations:

  • share information;
  • refer consumers appropriately;
  • learn what it is each organization does best;
  • benefit from these strengths and capacities collectively;
  • expand program offerings;
  • increase the knowledge and skills of frontline staff; and, ultimately,
  • provide more comprehensive services to all youth.

Row of orange dots.

Questions

1. Are there federal resources to help support school-based preparatory experiences?

No one piece of legislation covers the many activities that comprise preparatory experience for all youth. The responsibility for fitting the pieces together falls to policymakers at all levels. Several pieces of federal legislation are key in helping to prepare young people for the workplace, five are listed below. Also, NCWD/Youth has gathered and highlighted information about nine of these acts. Click here to view this information about disability legislation.

  • The No Child Left Behind Act allows dollars appropriated through this Act to be used to provide a disadvantaged child attending a low performing school with extra help in reading, language arts, and math, either before or after school or on weekends. It also gives grants to states for charter schools.

  • The Carl Perkins Career Technical Education Act recognizes the need for all youth to be exposed to career pathways that build bridges between high school and postsecondary education. Among the items that can be paid for through Perkins are vocational curriculum materials, materials for learning labs, curriculum development or modification, staff development, career counseling and guidance activities, supplemental services for special populations, salaries for vocational staff, remedial classes, and expansion of Tech Prep programs. Tech Prep education is defined as a planned sequence of study in a technical field beginning as early as the ninth year of school. The sequence extends through two years of postsecondary occupational education or an apprenticeship program of at least two years following secondary instruction, and culminates in an associate degree or certificate.

  • The Workforce Investment Act identifies core elements that promote both positive youth development and occupational preparation. Young people ages 14 and not more than 21 can receive services if they are low-income and meet one of the following criteria: have a deficiency in basic literacy skills; are a school dropout; are homeless, a runaway, or a foster child; are pregnant or a parent; are an offender, or are an individual who requires additional assistance to complete an educational program, or to secure and hold employment. Services include tutoring; study skills training and instruction leading to completion of secondary school, including dropout prevention strategies; alternative secondary school services; summer employment opportunities; paid and unpaid work experiences; occupational skill training; leadership development opportunities; supportive services; mentoring, and follow up services.

  • The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires exposing youth with disabilities to curricula based on high standards, and emphasizes the importance of helping young people participate in planning for their transition from the protected environment of school into the adult world. Transition planning is mandated to start by age 14 (or earlier if appropriate) by focusing on the student's course of study, including planning coursework and school-based preparatory experiences to reflect postsecondary goals. By age 16 (or earlier if appropriate), more intensive planning focuses on school and adult-oriented outcomes, as well as linkages with appropriate agencies and supports that reflect the student's postsecondary goals.

  • The Vocational Rehabilitation Act recognizes the value of helping young people make wise choices via high quality assessments and career counseling. Vocational rehabilitation services are provided through local offices of state agencies and through community-based organizations, often referred to as community rehabilitation programs, under contractual arrangements with the state agencies. Transition services are often provided through cooperative agreements between state and local school and college systems, and the vocational rehabilitation agency.

Funding opportunities associated with these Acts can be found online:

Row of orange dots.

2. What can policy makers at the state and local levels do to promote school-based preparatory experiences?

There is a range of actions that policymakers can undertake to promote the development of school-based preparatory experiences. At the state and local levels those responsible for coordinating the workforce development system are nicely positioned to convene key institutions to review the current state of practice and develop strategic plans that tap all federal, state, and local resources. The State Workforce Investment Board, the State Youth Council (if one exists), and/or the mandated youth council of the Local Workforce Investment Board can launch this effort. Reaching out to related advisory councils that have a special focus on youth with disabilities will help generate both buy-in and fiscal support. These related councils and networks at the state level include:

  • State Councils on Developmental Disabilities,
  • State Rehabilitation Councils,
  • Independent Living Councils,
  • IDEA Advisory Council, and
  • The Business Leadership Network.

Representatives from the state board of Education, Special Education, and Career and Technical Education Offices, Vocational Rehabilitation, Labor, Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities need to be included. If a state has launched a Social Security Ticket-to-Work program, a representative from that program should be included as well.

At the local level, a Youth Council of a Workforce Investment Board could convene the local counterparts to the above mentioned state organizations and networks, and additionally include transition coordinators from local school districts and career and technical education managers, as well as representatives from:

  • One-Stop Centers,
  • centers for independent living,
  • rehabilitation service organizations,
  • local chambers of commerce,
  • parent groups,
  • postsecondary offices of disability support services, etc.

These advisory networks need not become permanent bodies, but can help by providing information about the current state of preparatory services and supports, identifying resources and points for collaboration, and suggesting other steps to ensure that youth with disabilities have access to school-based preparatory experiences.

Tools that may be useful include:

  • Requests for proposals from vendors using pooled resources from more than one funding stream, and
  • Memorandums of understanding between two or more agencies to blend fiscal resources and/or services, such as sharing information from assessments or jointly sponsoring guest speakers, work-site visits, joint training of staff, etc.

No policymaker should ignore the power of the bully pulpit to heighten awareness of the value of these school-based preparatory experiences. For example, while working with employer and business and industry associations, policymakers should encourage them to become guest speakers and active participants in giving informational interviews to youth.

Row of orange dots.

3. What does research sponsored by employer associations say about career preparation for youth that can be used to inform policy?

In the fall of 2001, Ferris State University's Career Institute for Education and Workforce Development conducted a telephone survey of over 800 high school juniors and seniors to study their attitudes and career plans. This study, which was commissioned by three employer associations (the National Association of Manufacturers, the Precision Metalforming Association Educational Foundation, and the Associated Equipment Distributors Foundation), revealed the following:

  1. Most young people are not receiving career guidance in school or the community. Of the 809 youth surveyed for the study, only 10% said that school personnel had played a primary role in career guidance. Teachers were credited with more career influence than guidance counselors were overall. 46% could not identify anyone outside of parents or schools who had provided them with career counseling or guidance. 78% of young people said their parents were the greatest source of career advice, although these same students had spent less than 3 hours in the past few months discussing careers with their parents.
  2. Most students (94%) planned to attend either a two-year or four-year college or technical school after graduation, although the study cites research showing that 42% do not actually participate in post-secondary education. Furthermore, of those who do enter college, only 28% actually graduate with a bachelor's degree.
  3. Career choices by students were largely based on interest rather than perceived opportunity. 67% of the students surveyed indicated they chose a career or job based on its match with their likes, interests and abilities, instead of money, availability or opportunity for advancement.

The study offered the following recommendations for policymakers and practitioners to improve career guidance and development:

  • Fund and provide professional development for K-12 career counselors
  • Utilize summer months for quality school-based preparatory experiences involving multiple stakeholders
  • Increase partnerships between education and industry
  • Revise and realign career recruitment efforts to reflect students' priorities
  • Improve credit transfer among educational institutions to improve "re-careering"
  • Integrate career development systems nationwide
  • Promote the concept of "career pathways"

To read the full report, go to Ferris State University's Career Institute for Education and Workforce Development website at:
http://www.ferris.edu/htmls/administration/president/ci/ncds.htm

Row of orange dots.

4. Are there any examples of how states have implemented school-based preparatory experiences for youth with disabilities?

In the 2001 report, "Including Youth with Disabilities in Educational Reform: Lessons Learned From School-to-Work States," the National Transition Alliance for Youth with Disabilities (NTA) selected nine states (Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island and Vermont) to illustrate efforts to include youth with disabilities in School-To-Work (STW) activities. Consideration was given to the number of years of experience the state had in implementing STW practices, its close relationship with its Transition System Change Initiative (TSCI), and its willingness to share information with others.

The NTA report provides many examples, including:

  • Writing STW components for all students into the state's education reform plans.
  • Using interagency collaboration and cooperation, linkages and partnerships, and leadership to effect, strengthen and sustain inclusive STW systems. State and local procedures were enacted to guarantee that agencies worked together.
  • Using the leadership from a variety of stakeholder groups to influence inclusive STW policy. Inclusive STW policy formation came not only from STW, TSCI, and the special education community, but also from the grass roots efforts of advocacy groups and parents.

To read more about NTA's School to Work study, go to http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/sped/tri/statestories.htm#Introduction.

Row of orange dots.

Resources

Disability Legislation
http://www.ncwd-youth.info/resources_&_Publications/disability_Legislation/index.html#content
No one piece of legislation defines government services to youth with disabilities or for that matter, any youth. Instead, there are a number of acts that impact youth with disabilities. NCWD/Youth has gathered and highlighted information about nine of these acts.

High School/High Tech (HS/HT)
http://www.ncwd-youth.info/resources_&_Publications/hsht_manual.html
HS/HT is a national program with an emphasis on quality school-based preparatory experiences for youth with disabilities. With many sites sponsored by the Department of Labor's Office of Disability Employment Policy (ODEP), and supported by NCWD/Youth, High School/High Tech exposes students with disabilities to careers in the science, mathematics and technology fields.

Colorado School to Career
http://www.cde.state.co.us/schooltocareer/index.htm
The mission of Colorado School-to-Career was to bring students, businesses, communities, schools and families together to form partnerships. These partnerships offer many options to students, educators, business leaders and community members - from job shadowing experiences to curriculum.

Illinois Education to Careers
http://www.isbe.net/career/pdf/etc_disabilities.pdf
Education-to-Careers (etc) works to improve education to be of better quality and more relevant to students, with the goal of this translating into a more reliable workforce. Etc calls this concept of academics relating to the needs of the workforce “New Generation Education”.

Career Connections
http://www.careernet.state.md.us/careers.htm
Career Connections is a part of Maryland’s Goal 2000/Schools for Success long-term plan. This school-to-career system works with community partners with the creation of a new learning enterprise that will support school reform, workforce preparation and economic development.

School-to-Work Online
http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/workforce/stw/
School-To-Work is working toward the goal of providing all students with both the academic and workforce skills necessary to be productive employees in today’s changing workforce.

"Preparing Youth with Disabilities for an Increasingly Technical Workplace" American Youth Policy Forum Brief, January 26, 2001
http://www.aypf.org/forumbriefs/2001/fb012601.htm
This forum brief reports on the panel discussion regarding the effects of today’s increasingly technical work place on youth with disabilities. Policymakers listened to the panelists discuss promising solutions and strategies that could be implemented.

"Family Role in Career Development" American Association of School Administrators - Issues and Insights
http://www.cete.org/acve/docgen.asp?tbl=archive&ID=A008
This publication from the American Association of School Administrators focuses on how the family can influence career development for youth. Topics include: influences of family background, ethnic minority parents and career development, negative effects of parental influences, and implications for practice.

 


Home | About Us | Resources & Publications | Pro-Bank | FAQ |
Accessibility Statement | Privacy & Security Policy | Links Policy

   
© 2002–2008 NCWD/Youth
Page updated 19 May, 2008
   

NCWD/Youth | c/o Institute for Educational Leadership
4455 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 310 | Washington, DC 20008
Telephone: 1-877-871-0744 (Toll Free)
TTY: 877-871-0665 (Toll Free)